|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 43 post(s) |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 17:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
So CCP... Incarna was one of your lies too? Nice... Just keep promising thing that you will not keep... thats soo good for players confidence in you and business... |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.17 14:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:Houm... so "Team avatar" is about one week old... CCP Guard's answer was about one week ago... All after two months ignoring the thread. I think it's not too far an stretch of imagination to think that "Team avatar" does exist because of this thread.
Its not stretch at all, its the truth. Its good thing that WiS once again have its own team, team only for development of WiS. While i think that 5 ppl is too small number of ppl for WiS team (WiS - thing that will brought EVE on all new level of player experience and gameplay), but its progress.
@ Team Avatar: We love you guys. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 10:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aquila Draco wrote:Nice to see that WiS is a live... Just... 5 people working on it is toooo low number. But... better that than nothing, for now. P.S. This thread is officially the biggest thread on this forum! (until now the biggest was "Rate the Avatar above you" - and that's actually also WiS related thread )
When i read this part, its actually very funny... everybody talk WiS. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority! Voice of Reason PartyIssler
I am afraid that's impossible. Large alliances will make their member to vote for only ppl they like and that's it. CSM like idea is broken. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 11:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority! Voice of Reason PartyIssler I am afraid that's impossible. Large alliances will make their member to vote for only ppl they like and that's it. CSM like idea is broken. If folks wake up and get involved all the members of the large power blocks combined are a fraction of active accounts. Players of Eve are starting to see the CSM can change Eve and sometimes in ways they might like want. Issler Dainze Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate
Yea, if all EVE players vote then that is fraction. But when their corp/alliance leaders tell them to vote for that guy "or else"... or "if that guy don't have more then ### votes then" that that ppl must vote for that guy and other free ppl that freely play the game wont vote because they play the game and don't play forums and all candidates are only known to forum ppl.
i think that voting needs to be more integrated in the game. make ppl feel that elected ppl decide about their virtual faith. and, make it that ppl must vote or click i don't want to vote button. Then ppl will see that that matters, that their vote matters.
I hope that you understand... written in the hurry. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 11:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Razin wrote:Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:How about we make sure there are some CSM7 members that have ambulation as a priority! Voice of Reason PartyIssler I am afraid that's impossible. Large alliances will make their member to vote for only ppl they like and that's it. CSM like idea is broken. Working as intended. Players who are active in game and have a large following get elected. There's no in- or out of game mechanism to force anyone to vote; it's all voluntary. Nothing wrong with that.
The problem is that CSM voting, now, is out of game thing. And its not voluntary when your alliance/corp leader tells you that you must vote for that guy "or else". And everything is wrong with that. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 09:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:
My theory about folks not playing Eve because of not being able to leave their ships in any meaningful way is based on actual facts.
Still waiting to see these facts of yours, ones I and others can verify. Please try not to evade this time by trying to shift the onus to me and just admit you have nothing but what you *believe* to be true. I can believe you might have filed a patent for a company as a clerk or paper-pusher someplace, but you were never responsible for creating any patentable IP unless it was for shoveling BS around. But please do go on, while we're at it I'd like to introduce you to my wife, Morgan Fairchild. I most definitely contributed considerable IP to the DX shader model and am listed as an inventor for four of the patents, present at several major technical conferences about the standards I helped develop and assisted virtually every hardfware company making compatible hardware comply with the DX9 standards and even recieved several quite nice bonuses when the patents were granted, but I expect you enjoy Morgan more than I enjoyed what I did with the money.... Also contributed to patents at Compaq and Motorola in the 35 years I've been an engineer in the PC space.... but again, your imaginary spouse is very impressitve.... So what do you do for a living, does it involve fast food fryers?? Issler Still waiting to see those facts you claim to have.. Your attempts to distract from that via irrelevant chest-beating notwithstanding. What it must be like in your head.....
@ Issler Dainze the more this 2 ppl attack you for the last few pages, and don't accept any logic argument, the more and more i like you because of your responses. (not only the quoted one... this was just the last one ) |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 23:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Not bad ideas. That way if you want you can stay in your pod but you will get less then person that do that same thing on foot. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 12:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Snowulf Romanov wrote:Sirius Cassiopeiae wrote:Not bad ideas. That way if you want you can stay in your pod but you will get less then person that do that same thing on foot. It's not a bad idea, but there would definitely need to be a way to walk/run faster than we do now. If there wasn't, most of your time would be eaten by walking around the station instead of actually doing missions.
Please NO RUNNING. It will look like WoW all ppl running around. And it is not anything like IRL. Give us something like Segway. It would look nice. And ppl would be faster. |
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 12:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Stuff
Absent a valid answer to an argument you are predictably reduced to the ad homenim again. I have made no accusations or taken a position one way or another no matter how much you read that into my request for factual information. I have simply asked for your evidence to back up your assertions that a MAJORITY (i.e. 51% or more) of EVE players want WIS, and you have still not provided anything other than "proving non-existence" and "ad homenim" fallacies. You did provide a couple of links to irrelevant information, but if somewhere in there it actually states that a MAJORITY of players want WIS I am just not seeing it. "A number of players" could be 1, 2, or it could be 10000. Who's to say? Not you or me. Where is your proof exactly? EVE has over 300K accounts and maybe 10% post on the forums (guessing). Anything else you think I am doing or saying only exists in your mind.
And where is your evidence that "MAJORITY (i.e. 51% or more) of EVE players" do not want WIS? Its easy to attack somebody without any evidence in your favor. |
|
Sirius Cassiopeiae
Perkone Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 12:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meryl SinGarda wrote:Wow, I took a much needed break from the forums and I am very surprised to see that this topic is still here! I support WiS but not entirely at the expense of FiS gameplay.
We do not want WiS and only WiS. We want WiS AND FiS in one and only EVE. We want EVE that will last for many many more years.
Yet some other people here want to tell the world that we want to kill FiS because they do not want WiS "because it will ruin the game" and don't have arguments to back up that opinion. |
|
|
|